Friday, November 16, 2012

5-Point Guide To The Fiscal Showdown

5-Point Guide To The Fiscal Showdown

1. The “Fiscal Cliff” Is A Myth. As Paul Krugman put it, “The looming prospect of spending cuts and tax increases isn’t a fiscal crisis. It is, instead, a political crisis brought on by the G.O.P.’s attempt to take the economy hostage.”1 Republicans are manufacturing this crisis to pressure Democrats to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and accept painful cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

2. The Bush Tax Cuts Finally End December 31. If Congress does nothing, the ax will fall on all the Bush tax cuts on New Year’s Eve.2 Then, on January 1, the public pressure on John Boehner and House Republicans to extend the middle-class tax cuts (already passed by the Senate and waiting to be signed by President Obama) will become irresistible.3 So the middle-class tax cut will eventually get renewed, and we’ll have $823 billion more revenue from the top 2% to do great things with.4

3. The Sequester. The sequester is another political creation, forced on Democrats by Republicans in exchange for lifting the debt ceiling last year to avoid crashing our economy.5 It’s a set of cuts (50% to a bloated military budget and 50% to important domestic programs) designed to make both Republicans and Democrats hate it so much that they’d never let it happen.6 And the cuts can be reversed weeks or months into 2013 without causing damage.7

4. The Big Three. Nothing happens to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits on January 1—unless Republicans force painful cuts to beneficiaries in exchange for tax increases on the wealthy, which are going to happen anyway if Congress does NOTHING.8 So, there’s literally no reason benefits cuts should be part of the discussion right now.

5. We Should Be Talking About Jobs. The real crisis Americans want Congress to fix is getting people back to work. And with just a fraction of that $823 billion from the wealthiest 2%, we could create jobs for more than 20,000 veterans and pay for the 300,000 teachers and 52,000 first responders, which our communities so desperately need.9 That’s not to mention jobs from investing in clean energy and our national infrastructure.

Please share this with your friends and family—and talk about it at the dinner table next week. The first step to winning this showdown is making sure we’re all armed with the facts.

Sources

1. “Hawks and Hypocrites,” The New York Times, November 11, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284476

2. “Bush-Era Tax Cuts,” The New York Times, November 9, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284477

3. “Boehner Is Bluffing,” Slate, November 9, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284478

4. “CBO: Ending High-Income Tax Cuts Would Save Almost $1 Trillion,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, August 24, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284479

5. “The sequester, explained,” The Washington Post, September 14, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284480

6. Ibid.

7. “Let’s Not Make a Deal,” The New York Times, November 8, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284484

8. “How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities,” April 27, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284489

9. “Veterans’ Jobs Bill Blocked in the Senate,” The New York Times, September 19, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=284488

“Jan Schakowsky Announces new Budget Plan With Focus On Jobs,” The Huffington Post, August 10, 2011
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=263135

“Fact Sheet: The American Jobs Act,” The White House, September 8, 2011
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=264021

Want to support our work? We’re entirely funded by our 7 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.

6 comments:

  1. It's sad that you believe that Republicans are 100% evil, while Democrats are 100% saints.

    Somehow I don't think that spouting this rhetoric will help with negotiations and compromise, especially considering that both sides were 100% involved in creating the current situation.

    Peace,
    Randy

    ReplyDelete
  2. No, I don't think that at all.

    But a high percentage of the GOP elected officials are beholden to their multi-million-dollar donors. They're willing to toss the US economy under the bus in order to prevent the wealthiest 2% from paying a little more in taxes.

    That's craven, and dumb. And it's not what most Americans want.(EG "Polls show most Americans support raising taxes on wealthy" http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20110458-503544/polls-show-most-americans-support-raising-taxes-on-wealthy/)

    When elected politicians in a supposed democracy oppose what most citizens want, what do you call it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think we, as a nation, need to begin spending assuming that our current situation is the new normal.

    I believe that Democrats also have multi-million-dollar donors, who expect something in return. I think those donors should donate the money directly to the individuals needing it.

    Of course most American what someone else to pay higher taxes! About 4% of all households earn more than $250,000. My question to you, is how much is too much? The answer is *not* more taxes. It's also not *creating* jobs. The answer is an improved economy that will generate more jobs. And using veterans, teachers and fire fighters as examples is just there to pull at your heart strings. Don't you care about iron workers and trash collectors and accountants and journalists too? Besides each local government and their constituents decides how many teachers and fire fighters to employ. Do you want to override their local decisions?

    Re: When elected politicians in a supposed democracy oppose what most citizens want, what do you call it?
    I could call it preventing a tyranny of the majority.

    I believe that we have to look at those big three. I'm about 10 years from being eligible to collect, but realize that the system is likely going to crash down on itself if we don't reduce outlays with either less money, or older eligibility or means testing. I believe that 100% of everyone's income should be taxed for Social Security instead of limited to (about) the first 100K. Additionally, there's no reason that a millionaire should ever receive any benefits.

    We also spend way too much on our military. Clinton was able to balance the budget and even generate a surplus when he cut the military spending.

    You don't help your position when the entire bibliography contains only references to the same liberal site. I realize that you are simply forwarding a link, but I also assume you agree 100%, since you didn't comment on it at all. And I know you are a thoughtful person.

    Peace,
    Randy

    ReplyDelete
  4. Most of the donors to the Obama campaign were from average people. One of the best quotes I read after the election was, "united citizens defeated Citizens United".
    I don't want someone else to pay higher taxes. I have been poor, and I have been comfortable. I do not have a problem paying higher taxes when I can afford my home, insurances, and food. I have always worked. I have a problem with people who have their money working for them and try to say it is on par with someone who works 40 hrs. a week. It is not the same. It should not be taxed the same. Poor people do not get to use their money like wealthier people do. That is the problem with the poor people who vote GOP. They are just plain ignorant of how the wealthy work the system.
    Regarding local decisions and teachers? I think the USA should have a quality education available whether in CT or MS. Period.
    I agree on means testing 100%. I agree we spend waaaaay too much on the military.
    These ideas are anathema to the GOP. The fact you agree with me must make you a liberal, too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Considering the outcome of the election, I'll have to concede your point about campaign donations.

    Re: They are just plain ignorant of how the wealthy work the system.

    WOW! It's impossible for the poor to believe that the GOP has a better plan for them to get a leg up? You just summed up in one sentence the arrogance of liberals. You know better. Get out of my way and let me tell you what you want. WOW!

    I believe that each student (as supported by their parents) decides the quality of their education. And that's independent from the age of the books and buildings. Of course the number of and quality of the teachers do matter, but it's mostly up to the student.

    No, I'm not liberal, but we can still be friends. I mostly believe in personal choices *and* responsibility. And helping people however you can.

    Peace,
    Randy -- goodconversation

    ReplyDelete
  6. [I'm sorry. I thought that Anonymous's comment was from you Fred. It sure sounded like you. -randy]

    ReplyDelete