I'm not in the computer tech world anymore, so let me say this as an ordinary user, passing along an opinion to friends: The new Zonealarm "Checkup" service is a total piece of crap. Stay far, far away.
Zonealarm "Checkup" is actually a front for Iolo's "System Mechanic" software, which I was never crazy about to begin with. But they've now jumped onto the FUD bandwagon and are using Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt as a way to move product.
Many of you reading this know I have 30+ years in the PC business, mostly writing articles about how to keep your hardware and software humming smoothly. As a result, my systems are tuned and secured to the max. I do almost all significant system work and optimization manually or with semi-automated tools I've set up manually because I simply don't trust "black box" software to know my systems as well as I do. I have a multi-layered defense in place--- firewall, anti-spyware, anti-malware, antivirus, etc.--- and have a number of maintenance routines that run every night to clean and check my system. I know my system is OK.
But ZoneLabs/Alarm's "Checkup" rates my system status as "poor" and its security as "fair." Here are some of the details they report:
This, my friends, is a total crock. All--- every one--- of the "warnings" are bogus, as I discovered when I drilled down to their explanations.
Example 1: Checkup says I have two "active spyware infections." Checkup won't tell me what they are, of course, unless I buy their full software. But because I know what's on my system, I know that Checkup is lying. What it's really reporting is a couple of utterly harmless cookies.
Cookies are plain text files that constitute almost zero threat even in the worst of circumstances. The other 99.99% of the time, they truly are harmless. But cheesy security software likes to call all cookies "tracking cookies" because that makes them sound scarier, and theoretically makes you want to reach for your wallet to buy the software that will valiantly guard you against this (mostly nonexistant) threat. It's bad enough to call these harmless cookies "tracking cookies" but calling them "active spyware infections" takes fear-mongering to a whole new level. Nice work, Zonelabs! You've lowered the bar!
Example 2: Checkup says my system has too much "clutter," and goes on to say I have 121MB of junk files on my system. My system cleans itself every night; that 121MB of files is the normal irreducible collection of temp files that are produced by routine, ongong operation of my system. I can get the number of temp files lower if I shut down all apps and run a thorough cleanup, but as soon as I start using my PC for anything real, the number bumps back up again. These in-use temporary files only become junk when or if they're later orphaned and not cleaned up. Any real-world, in-use system will have some "clutter," and the presence of a small number of such files is totally meaningless. To point to these files and claim a system has too much "clutter" is, well, just plain lying.
Example 3: Checkup gives my Registry a failing grade because it contains 7 errors. I almost LOLed at this one. I've seen Registries with 7000 errors that still worked OK; and it's not at all uncommon for even a reasonably well-maintained Registry to have 700 errors. ("Errors" can be anything from real (but rare) stability-threatening screwups down to common but almost meaningless imperfections. While it's better to have as few errors as possible, most "errors" require no remedial action whatsoever.)
Seven errors is about as few as you'll ever see a Registry on a real-world, in-use PC. For Checkup to think this merits a failing grade is just plain silly.
There are many more examples, but the short form is that it's clear that Checkup is set to "fail" PCs for no good reason in order to scare you into buying their magical elixir, System Mechanic, which will fix all these supposed problems; even, I guess, the imaginary ones.
Don't fall for it. No matter what legitimate good that Registry Mechanic may do for your system, the fact that they're using bottom-feeding scare tactics to sell their software makes me want to avoid it--- and to tell all my friends to avoid it, too.
"Checkup" indeed. Hey, Zonealarm and Iolo: Turn your head and cough.
Thanks for the refreshing view of this software. Too often reviews are too vanilla for me- like you said before you tried to be "balanced and noninflammatory". It is truly rare to come across reviews that tell you to stay away (and with obvious good reason).
ReplyDeleteWhen supposedly "real" companies like ZoneAlarm start acting like the popup junk that tells you your system is infected, only to sell you malicious or junk software, I think it taints everything that company does. How can you trust a company with its other products if it is peddling this junk?
What Matt said!
ReplyDeleteToo bad that because of the Zonealarm name people will still buy this junk. Here's hoping your review will come up in search results if those potential customers think to do a search on it.
And BTW, what a beautiful part of the world you live in! (Previous post)
I have a park behind my house too, but the scenery in Australia is so different. Lotsa gum trees and the odd kangaroo. And bone dry at present. I think I'd like to swap for a while!
Steven
Wagga Wagga
Thank you for steering us clear of this junk. Just this week, I had to clean this same kind of worthless "utility" from my son's computer. It also wanted me to buy a cleaner to fix a working system. There otta be a law.
ReplyDeleteGreat closing, btw. ""Checkup" indeed. Hey, Zonealarm and Iolo: Turn your head and cough."
LOL!
I see that it is really liberating to be able to talk to us not as a well balanced and objective reviewer but as a human being.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work and thanks for the advice!!
hi Fred, thanks for the heads-up.
ReplyDeletepersonally, i gave up on zone alarm years ago when my computer was hacked and i had to redo everything.
the only time i ever had that problem was while using their software.
i remember similar experences,with various other crappy programs "warning" me...despite every single test other than theirs showing my system to be clean.
so....mad props for telling the truth sir!
peace
jimi
I have Zone Alarm on my XP partition. (I use Ubuntu for most of my work, but keep XP for a couple apps.) I found it curious that it flagged a couple cookies as spyware during the last scan. I thought, "Cookies! What harm can they do?"
ReplyDeleteIt's sad when a respected name falls into the pit. Remember when the Norton Utilities worked? I'm glad to read your unfettered comments, and I'm looking forward to reading your remarks about things outside the scope of the PC world.
ReplyDeleteHello Fred. Thanks for the warning about Zonelabs newly found greed. It's always a shame when the respected companies (Norton, at one time) and now ZA fall into the greed motivation pit. I'll still use the free ZA for a while but sooner or later....
ReplyDeleteI gave up on Zonelabs after they were bought out by Check Point...
ReplyDeleteI learned to trust Fred years ago while reading his columns in Windows Magazine. I've followed him to the LangaList and then to Windows Secrets. I've learned alot from him over the years and his recommendations have never steered me wrong.
ReplyDeleteAnother great review, Fred :-)
Fred, I've been complaining about this Scareware Scanner for months! I tried to post to the Zone Alarm User Forums, and was told that I was "Off Topic" and to Go Home And Cry, basically, by their "Gurus".
ReplyDeleteI have a blog at Yahoo 360, where I have posted my own results from using this Scanner, in complete detail. No useful info whatsoever!
Just an ad for an Iolo product.
Kim Komando's message boards are full of reports of system damages caused by the products Iolo is selling with this scanner. If you want to see a good scanner (but correcting errors is still not free), try PC Tools PC Pitstop free Optimizer 2.0 on line scanner.
If I needed to cotrrect something found by this scanner, I do trust the $30.00 product for cleanup at PC Tools.
Zone Alarm Firewall is free to download and use, so I guess we may have to put up with all of this nonsense. You might want to visit my blog and see what I got from the scanner.
-- Bob Primak -- First saw your byline at Windows Secrets-LangaList --
I'd love to see what the esteemed Kim Komando would have to say about JV16 because just like another person here already said, it's good. In fact it's better than good. I'm a loyal user.
ReplyDelete